Jordan Peterson has launched a scathing critique of Mark Carney’s ascent to Canada’s prime ministership, framing it as a continuation of Justin Trudeau’s “woke globalist agenda” with more efficient execution. Peterson argues Carney’s policies prioritize , , and over practical economic realities, threatening Canada’s prosperity.
### Key Criticisms
Peterson dismisses Carney’s climate agenda as “insane inanities,” warning that phasing out fossil fuels would devastate Alberta’s energy sector and leave Canadians vulnerable to energy poverty. He likens Carney’s green transition plans to “building a house on land you don’t own,” arguing they ignore the economic necessity of reliable energy sources like oil and gas in a country with extreme winters.
Carney’s advocacy for —which prioritizes non-market values like climate targets and social justice—is labeled “fascist central planning” by Peterson. He claims these policies harm competitiveness, stifle free markets, and have already been abandoned by major financial institutions like BlackRock and Vanguard due to economic fallout.
While Carney presents himself as an “outsider,” Peterson emphasizes his deep ties to Trudeau’s Liberal establishment, calling him a “veritable leader” of the World Economic Forum’s “authoritarian elitist” movement. Peterson argues Carney’s policies will exacerbate Canada’s housing crisis, stagnant GDP growth, and trade tensions with the U.S., all while doubling down on Trudeau’s “postnational” vision that undermines Canadian identity.
Peterson mocks Carney’s reliance on “slogans and sound bites” rather than substantive economic strategy, comparing his macroeconomic expertise to a “dermatologist attempting neurosurgery.” He warns that Carney’s net-zero dogma ignores the transformative role of AI and data-driven economies, leaving Canada unprepared for future challenges.
### Political Context
Peterson’s critique aligns with conservative pushback against Carney’s cancellation of the consumer carbon tax—a move seen as political expediency rather than principled policy—and his retention of industrial carbon pricing and emissions caps. Analysts note Carney’s green finance initiatives, like the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, are collapsing globally, further undermining his credibility.
In summary, Peterson views Carney as a “more efficient Trudeau” whose policies risk accelerating Canada’s decline into “comparative poverty and irrelevance” while prioritizing ideological conformity over national interests.
