in ,

New Footage Contradicts DHS Narrative in Pretti Shooting Debacle

Newly surfaced videos of the Minneapolis confrontation involving Alex Pretti make it impossible to swallow the smooth, pre-packaged spin coming from Washington. Bystander footage shows Pretti confronting immigration officers days earlier and again on the day he was killed, and multiple angles suggest he held a cellphone — not a weapon — in the moments before agents tackled him. The raw footage raises serious questions about the timeline the Department of Homeland Security pushed out and the rush to demonize a private citizen instead of answering very basic questions.

Pretti was a 37-year-old ICU nurse and, by all accounts, a lawful gun owner who held a permit to carry; his grieving family has retained experienced counsel to press for answers as the dust settles. That fact matters because too many in power treat the mere presence of a holstered firearm as a license to use lethal force without full accountability. Ordinary Americans who follow law and carry responsibly deserve equal protection under the Constitution, not to be shorthand in a White House press line.

Close, frame-by-frame reviews by reputable outlets show a chilling sequence: an agent appears to remove a handgun from Pretti’s waistband and then, less than a second later, other agents fire multiple rounds while he lies restrained. These are not the kind of “split-second” ambiguities the administration wants you to believe; they are avoidable failures of command and restraint that cost a life. If federal officers can take a weapon from a man and then an agent still opens fire, Americans have a right to know why that chain of events was allowed to happen.

Instead of a sober, transparent inquiry, we watched top officials rush to declare Pretti a threat and even use incendiary language that inflames already-tense communities. Senior aides and some administration voices leapt to label him something akin to a domestic terrorist before all the facts were in, a move that smells of political cover-up, not courage. Washington’s reflexive defense of federal agents, combined with a readiness to smear a dead man, will not sit well with patriots who believe in both law enforcement and individual rights.

Conservatives should be crystal clear: we support law enforcement and the rule of law, but we will not bend the Constitution in the name of expedience or political theater. Video evidence that contradicts official claims must be followed by a real, independent investigation — not a whitewash handled by the same agency under whose watch the shooting occurred. The American people deserve transparency, bodycam footage released in full, and accountability where rules and training were ignored.

This moment is a test for the right — stand with due process and the Second Amendment, but also demand that federal agents be held to the highest standards when they operate among our communities. If the administration wants to wage a hardline border fight, it can start by ensuring its operatives act lawfully and humanely, not by shutting down questions and slinging labels at grieving families. Patriots who work, pay taxes, and stand by their neighbors should insist on answers, and they should keep the pressure on until justice — not spin — prevails.

Written by Keith Jacobs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dana Loesch Calls for Justice: Lawful Carriers Aren’t Criminals

Appeals Court Bolsters ICE Power Amid Protests and Judicial Overreach