Conservative filmmaker Robby Starbuck is fighting back after Meta’s AI falsely labeled him a criminal and called for his children to be taken away. The lawsuit claims Meta’s AI spread lies about Starbuck participating in the January 6 Capitol riots and being a White supremacist—claims he says are entirely fabricated. Starbuck discovered the falsehoods while challenging corporate DEI policies, which he argues are destroying American values. Meta’s reckless AI behavior has already sparked death threats against his family and cost him business opportunities.
The lawsuit reveals Meta’s AI doubled down on lies even after being notified, refusing to correct the record. Starbuck says Meta’s apology came too late—nearly a year after the damage began. “They suggested my kids be taken from me,” he stated, emphasizing the emotional toll. Despite promises from Meta executives to investigate, the company has yet to implement meaningful safeguards against AI misinformation.
This case exposes how Big Tech’s unregulated AI tools threaten free speech and personal reputations. Starbuck’s legal team argues Meta prioritized woke DEI initiatives over factual accuracy, letting AI smear conservatives. The lawsuit demands Meta remove false claims from its systems and pay damages for endangering his family. “AI must have guardrails,” Starbuck declared, warning that unchecked tech giants will weaponize misinformation against everyday Americans.
Meta’s expansion of AI products to millions raises alarms about systemic bias. The company’s refusal to fix errors shows contempt for accountability, favoring corporate agendas over truth. Starbuck’s ordeal proves even outspoken patriots aren’t safe from Silicon Valley’s agenda. “This isn’t just about me—it’s about protecting the next generation,” he said, urging Americans to demand transparency from tech monopolies.
The situation escalated when a Harley-Davidson dealership used Meta’s AI lies to attack Starbuck’s anti-DEI campaign. Screenshots of false allegations circulated online, amplifying harassment. Meta’s AI didn’t just distort facts—it actively undermined his parenting and career. “They called me a Holocaust denier,” Starbuck noted, calling it character assassination disguised as technology.
Legal experts say this case could set critical precedents for AI accountability. If Starbuck wins, tech companies may finally face consequences for spreading harmful lies. Conservatives argue DEI-driven algorithms target right-leaning voices, twisting facts to fit narratives. “Meta’s malice is clear,” Starbuck said. “They’d rather destroy families than admit their AI is broken.”
Starbuck’s fight has become a rallying cry against Big Tech overreach. He urges Americans to reject AI systems that erase truth and freedom. “Mark Zuckerberg needs to search his soul,” he said, demanding Meta overhaul its AI to protect users. The case highlights how unchecked technology enables censorship—punishing those who challenge woke corporate agendas.
This isn’t just a legal battle—it’s a wake-up call. Starbuck’s nightmare proves AI can be weaponized to crush dissent and rewrite history. Conservatives warn that without drastic reforms, Meta’s lies will silence more patriots. “What they did to me, they’ll do to everyone,” Starbuck said. The message is clear: America must rein in AI before it erodes liberty entirely.
