During the course of the trial, it came to light that Jones' attorney, Andino Reynal, had inadvertently provided the prosecution with his client's phone records, which stretched back over a period of two years.
The prosecuting attorney Mark Bankston said on Thursday that he was "under request from various federal agencies and law enforcement to provide [the records]," and that he intended to do so "immediately" after the having heard, the judge forbade him from doing so. This information was reported on the Daily Wire website. Whether or not he was "under request from multiple federal agencies and law enforcement to produce" the records was the subject of Bankston's remarks.
He revealed the fact that he was "asked by the January 6 committee to turn the documents over," but he did not disclose who else had reached him.
Bankston continued by saying, "I believe that there is absolutely nothing, nothing, that Mr. Reynal has done to fulfil his obligations to protect his client and prevent me from doing that,"
In the event that Reynal wants to prevent his client's data from becoming into the hands of the committee, the judge gave him the advice to investigate whether or not he had any legal remedies available to him.
The records at issue include 2 years' valued of text communications, the majority of which reportedly involve individuals who are of interest to the January 6 Committee. The committee agreed in November to issue a subpoena for Jones considering that he was an obvious contributor in the demonstration that took occurred on dated 6th in the month of January, despite the fact that he did not take part in the incident itself.
The preceding is a summary of an article that originally appeared on The Post Millennial.
