in

Hannity Blasts NY Times for Shielding Illegal Immigrants

Sean Hannity didn’t mince words on December 8, 2025, when he took aim at the New York Times and Democratic leaders for what he rightly called a campaign to shield illegal immigrants while gutting law-enforcement tools. On his show Hannity accused the media and the left of turning a blind eye to the damage these policies do to public safety and to the officers who risk their lives to keep communities secure. The clip left no doubt where he stands: accountability, enforcement, and common-sense borders should not be negotiable.

That outrage is grounded in reality: even the New York Times chronicled prominent Democrats quietly admitting a failure on border policy in a piece published July 6, 2025 that exposed the political and moral consequences of their soft-on-border approach. Democrats’ past flirtation with decriminalizing illegal crossings and their subsequent hand-wringing have created a vacuum that hardline policies have rushed to fill, and voters noticed. Hannity’s point is simple and brutal — when leaders refuse to defend the rule of law, chaos fills the gap.

The problem isn’t theoretical. In New York City and elsewhere, progressive officials and activists have actively worked to obstruct federal immigration enforcement, with instances of local officials advising immigrants on how to thwart ICE and encourage resistance to lawful operations. That behavior is not compassion; it’s complicity in undermining the very institutions that protect fragile communities from violent criminals and cartel networks. The media’s reflexive defense of these actors underscores the rot: when the press sanitizes obstruction, enforcement becomes harder and dangerous.

Meanwhile, cities that declare sanctuary policies or limit cooperation with federal agents often end up hamstringing local police and eroding trust in law enforcement, because officers can’t do their jobs if witnesses and victims are scared or if cooperation with federal partners is blocked. This is not partisan hyperbole; it is the sober reality reported from multiple municipalities where public safety took a hit after shielding policies were enacted. Conservatives have warned about this for years, and now the admitted failures and real-world consequences are plain for anyone willing to look.

Patriotism demands more than slogans — it demands courage from both the press and politicians to defend borders, enforce laws, and back the men and women in uniform. The American people deserve leaders who put citizens’ safety first, not who score political points by protecting lawbreakers or vilifying the officers sent to uphold order. If Democrats truly want to regain credibility, they’ll stop the performative outrage and start delivering policies that secure the border and restore respect for the rule of law.

Hannity’s message was blunt because it must be: the New York Times and its allies can keep pretending their soft approach is moral, but the voters and the streets tell a different story. Conservatives will keep pressing for real enforcement, honest media accountability, and leadership that serves the nation rather than excuses illegal behavior. The choice is clear — either restore law and order or watch the consequences deepen; every parent, cop, and taxpayer should care which path America chooses.

Written by Keith Jacobs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ilhan Omar’s Wealth Explosion Sparks Scandal and Calls for Accountability

Greg Kelly Sounds Alarm on Masculinity Crisis in Modern Culture