AWR Hawkins of Breitbart News argues that Democrats’ focus on banning assault-style weapons reveals ulterior motives beyond public safety, questioning why they target firearms statistically less involved in overall gun crimes. This criticism stems from Pew Research data showing 85% of Democrats support banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, despite their relatively low usage in general firearm-related crimes.
– : Hawkins highlights that Democrats prioritize restricting assault weapons (used in ~3% of U.S. gun homicides) rather than handguns, which are involved in ~60% of firearm deaths. Critics argue this targets politically symbolic “weapons of war” rather than addressing the most common tools of violence.
– : Pew Research reveals stark polarization:
– 81% of Republicans believe gun ownership increases safety, while 74% of Democrats say it reduces safety.
– 85% of Democrats support assault weapon bans vs. 57% Republican opposition.
:
1. : Assault-style weapons are frequently used in high-casualty public massacres (e.g., Buffalo, 2022; Parkland, 2018), which drive public outrage and legislative action.
2. : Groups like Giffords.org argue that limiting access to military-grade firearms is a first step toward broader reforms, such as universal background checks and red flag laws.
:
– The Democratic 2024 platform emphasizes gun safety as a top issue, citing the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (2022) and advocating for renewed assault weapon bans.
– Republicans, including Hawkins, frame these efforts as encroachments on Second Amendment rights, pointing to rising background checks (15.2 million in 2024) as evidence of lawful gun ownership trends.
While Hawkins’ critique questions the efficacy of targeting assault weapons, Democrats maintain that reducing their availability addresses a uniquely lethal facet of gun violence. The debate reflects deeper ideological divides over balancing public safety and constitutional rights.