A new investigative platform from the watchdog UN Watch has exposed what every patriot should find enraging: nearly 500 UNRWA employees have been documented over a decade as engaged in terrorism, incitement, or membership in extremist organizations. This is not the work of a weekend blogger or a right-wing conspiracy — it is a painstaking, ten-year compilation that maps hundreds of verified cases and connections showing how deeply the rot runs inside the agency. The sheer scale of the findings should make every taxpayer pause before trusting another dollar to an organization that appears to have been infiltrated by the very groups we fight.
UN Watch’s reporting makes clear this was not a few isolated incidents but a structural problem: school principals, union leaders, and local managers were repeatedly shown fraternizing with or answering to Hamas and other terror groups. The evidence includes photographs, social media archives, eyewitness accounts, and official documents, painting a picture of an agency that too often acted as a partner rather than a neutral humanitarian actor. Americans who still believe in principled foreign aid must reckon with the uncomfortable truth that money intended to help civilians was apparently used to empower killers and indoctrinate children.
Worse, this revelation comes against a backdrop of repeated failures by UNRWA leadership to police its own ranks — meetings with terror leaders, reinstatements of suspended staff under pressure, and public displays of partnership that would make any sane donor question the agency’s neutrality. UN Watch’s January submissions documented high-level contacts and decisions that look less like diplomacy and more like accommodation with terror networks. If the U.N.’s own relief agency has become a staging ground for hatred, then continuing business as usual is not just naive — it is dangerous.
Washington has already grappled with the fallout: the United States has historically provided roughly $300 to $400 million a year to UNRWA and paused funding amid allegations and investigations. Congress and the State Department have signaled they will demand serious, verifiable reforms before any large-scale resumption, and many Americans rightly want their representatives to stop writing blank checks when the money can’t be traced away from terrorist influence. Taxpayers deserve a government that protects the homeland by ensuring their dollars do not fuel the very enemies we oppose.
Voices in conservative media are rightly calling for decisive action: commentators like Gary Lane have argued that the U.S. should permanently freeze the roughly $400 million it gives annually and move to dismantle UNRWA, replacing it with an alternative that is transparent, accountable, and free from extremist infiltration. This is not a call born of emotion alone but of commonsense national security and fiscal responsibility — if an institution repeatedly fails to safeguard neutrality and aids violent actors, it should lose its claim on American aid. Lawmakers who put party politics ahead of homeland security will answer to the voters when the next preventable tragedy occurs.
UN Watch itself has urged donor nations to stop propping up an agency that, according to its research, functions as a conduit for terror influence rather than purely humanitarian relief. The organization’s demand to dismantle or fundamentally reform UNRWA should be taken seriously by any policymaker who cares about protecting citizens, supporting genuine victims, and preserving the integrity of American foreign assistance. Continuing to fund a broken machine that perpetuates anti-Israel hatred and fuels radicalization is neither moral nor strategic.
This is a moment for courage in Washington. Congress and the White House must stop the bureaucratic hand-wringing, permanently suspend funding until independent, verifiable vetting is in place, and build a replacement humanitarian framework that American taxpayers can trust. Patriots do not sacrifice security on the altar of globalist institutions; we demand accountability, transparency, and results. Our men and women in uniform deserve a government that does not bankroll the networks that target them and our allies.
