James Comey’s “8647” seashell post sparked fury as conservatives called it a veiled assassination threat against President Trump. The former FBI director claims ignorance, but critics blast this defense as laughable. His history as America’s top law enforcement official makes his “I didn’t know” excuse implausible.
centers on slang where “86” means eliminate. Combined with Trump being the 47th president, many saw Comey’s beach art as a violent call to action. Trump allies immediately flagged the post as incitement, especially after two recent assassination attempts against him.
under scrutiny. As ex-FBI chief, he oversaw cases involving coded threats and symbolism. Conservatives argue he’s too experienced to miss “86” as a danger signal. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard shredded his claims, declaring, “Any other person would be behind bars”.
. The post came months after assassination attempts, when political rhetoric was already heated. Critics note Comey’s team carefully stages his social media posts, making accidental messaging unlikely. Trump blasted, “A child knows what that meant”.
. If a Trump ally posted similar imagery, media and Democrats would demand prosecution. Comey’s privileged status as a left-wing media darling shields him from consequences patriots would face.
. Comey’s anti-Trump bias is well-documented, from his handling of Hillary Clinton’s emails to his 2025 memoir. This post fits a trend of undermining Trump while posing as neutral.
. The Secret Service and FBI’s tepid response fuels public distrust. Ordinary Americans face SWAT teams for memes, but elites like Comey skate free after暗示 violence against a president.
. Tulsi Gabbard’s call for imprisonment resonates with conservatives tired of two-tiered justice. Until Comey faces handcuffs, faith in the system will keep eroding.
The evidence is clear: Comey’s “8647” was either a deliberate threat or staggering incompetence. Neither option justifies his freedom while everyday Americans rot in jail for lesser “crimes.”