A man accused of trying to kill former President Donald Trump faced another court hearing as legal experts question the handling of his case. Ryan Wesley Routh, a convicted felon, is charged with plotting to assassinate Trump at a Florida golf course in 2024. The case has drawn national attention as concerns grow about political violence and the justice system’s response.
Routh’s trial was recently delayed to September 2025 after his lawyers argued they needed more time to review evidence. Federal Judge Aileen Cannon refused to step down from the case despite defense claims of bias. Legal analyst Jonathan Turley criticized Routh’s defense team for not being “forthcoming” with details, suggesting they’re dragging out the process instead of addressing the serious charges.
Prosecutors say Routh stalked Trump for weeks before hiding near the golf course with a rifle. A Secret Service agent spotted him and fired shots, causing Routh to flee. He left behind a handwritten note offering $150,000 to anyone who could “finish the job” of killing Trump. The note matched letters Routh later sent warning that Trump’s reelection would spark a “civil war.”
The case took a dark turn when Routh was charged with attempted murder for a car crash caused during his arrest. A 6-year-old girl was critically injured when traffic backed up during the manhunt. Florida officials accused the Biden Justice Department of blocking state charges, claiming federal prosecutors prioritized politics over the victim’s family.
Routh’s behavior has raised alarms. He laughed with his lawyer during court appearances and sent rambling letters to news outlets attacking Trump. Conservatives argue the case shows weaknesses in America’s justice system, with some questioning why stronger charges weren’t filed immediately. The delayed trial has frustrated those demanding accountability.
Evidence against Routh includes multiple cellphones, a list of Trump’s locations, and the rifle found at the scene. Former Attorney General William Barr slammed the DOJ for releasing Routh’s “finish the job” note, warning it could inspire copycats. The revelations have fueled debates about how to protect public figures from extremists.
As Trump prepares to return to the White House, many wonder if the system can prevent future attacks. Routh’s case highlights the challenges of balancing security with fair trials. With the trial now over a year away, Americans will watch closely to see if justice is served or if political divisions continue to slow the process.
